Clashing of nationalisms

Estelada d'espelmes a la plaça Major de Vic 04

This article was published on Backbench

Catalonia is on the brink of pushing for separation from Spain. If the coalition of independence-supporting parties, Junts pel Sí (Together For Yes), wins a majority in regional elections on 27 September, they have promised to initiate a secession process. The reason nationalists are resorting to elections rather than using a referendum, like the one which took place in Scotland last year, is explained by the limitations imposed by the state. The Spanish Constitution, which was negotiated in the wake of Franco’s death at a time when modernists still feared the prospect of civil war should democratic demands go too far, makes it illegal for a referendum in Catalonia to be held. Instead, whether the region can become independent is supposedly a decision for all Spaniards to make. An attempt to hold a referendum was blocked last year; instead, last November there was a non-binding one, or, officially, a “citizen participation process on the political future of Catalonia”. It is also illegal, therefore, to do what the pro-independence parties promise to do should they win, so fireworks are expected.

Particularly on the right of Spanish politics, refusing to bow to regional wishes for more autonomy is a key rhetorical aim. The ruling Partido Popular has rushed through legislation which it claims gives the Constitutional Court more muscle should Catalan officials break the rules in the coming months. Meanwhile, politicians use extraordinary hyperbole. The former Socialist Prime Minister Felipe Gonzalez compared Catalonia’s bid for independence as something Germany or Italy would do in the 30’s in a long-winded opinion piece in El País. Current Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy was mocked on Tuesday after a disastrous radio interview. He claimed Catalans would involuntarily lose their Spanish and European nationality should the region separate (working on the presupposition Catalonia would be unable to rejoin the EU automatically). When the interviewer countered that, under the Spanish Constitution, anyone born in Spain could retain their Spanish and therefore European nationality when living abroad in a new Catalan state, Rajoy could not answer. For Catalan nationalists, this was another example of lies and scaremongering. It was made into a parody of a clip from The Simpsons (here).

Yet if the Spanish state is determined to ignore the democratic will of Catalans, nationalism in the region offers much to find fault with as well. One of the major flashpoints involves language. To what extent schools should use the Catalan language instead of Spanish, and how much choice parents should have over this, has been extremely controversial. A few decades ago, after repression of Catalan under Franco’s regime, nationalists argued that the school system should be adapted to support children whose mother tongue was the regional language. The idea that children benefit from learning in their native language is recognised by UNESCO and UNICEF. Since then, Catalan has become the main language in schools as the region has taken control of its own education system, with children learning in Spanish for just a few hours a week. Yet when 55% of Catalans speak just Spanish as their mother tongue, it is now Spanish which is unfairly treated. The Catalan government has stood firm before various legal cases.

The regional government has consistently favoured the promotion of Catalan in cultural matters as well, in the form of subsidies. Catalan works are favoured over Spanish ones: a notable example was when, a group of comic mime-artists called El Tricicle saw their wordless film fail to qualify for the regional government’s National Film Awards, because its title was in Spanish. Santiago Roncagliolo, a Peruvian writer, wrote a blistering critique of Catalan nationalism in El País in July, criticising it for shutting off from the Spanish-speaking world. He claimed it has gone from being the New York of the Spanish-speaking world to the Latvia. He says there is an exodus of Latin Americans writers, publishers and journalist from Barcelona: “nowadays, if you write in Spanish, your life is elsewhere”. The Catalan language is a major point of differentiation with the rest of Spain, and so nationalists are determined to encourage it. They see Spanish, a global language with 400 million native speakers and a mass cultural appeal, as a dominant force which must be restricted in order for Catalan to survive.

Some nationalist politicians have taken things further, seeing not just language but place of birth as a threat to the culture of the region. Herribert Barrera, the first president of the regional parliament, said Catalonia would “disappear” under the weight of immigration. His political discourse was louder than just a dog whistle: he also once claimed “in America, blacks have a lower IQ than whites” and defended the far-right Austrian politician Jörg Haider, arguing “when he says in Austria there are too many foreigners he is not making a racist statement”. The wife of Jordi Puyol, another former president, stated Muslim immigrants wanted to impose their own way of life and are the main beneficiaries of social security payments to large families. She complained about benefits going “to people who do not even know what Catalonia is.”

When Catalan nationalists are so determined to protect the integrity of their culture, immigration – from inside as well as outside Spain – is a threat. It is unsurprising that laws banning the burqa have been enforced in the region: in Barcelona it was made illegal to wear a full-face veil in some public spaces. A more restrictive ban in Lleida, a Catalan town with a Muslim population of just 3%, was overturned by the Supreme Court. Since returning to a democracy Spain has tended to eschew far-right politics; probably a legacy of the Franco dictatorship. Yet one exception is Plataforma per Catalunya, a minor Catalan party which worries about the ‘islamification’ of Catalonia and Spain.

Catalonia is left then, between two strident and shrill forces. Nationalism is inherently divisive and illogical: it is based on separation from the ‘other’ and a selective reading of history and how culture is formed. Yet it is wrong to deny the right to self-determination, messy as it could become. If the Spanish government were to let Catalonia have a referendum over independence, it could defeat nationalism at the polls instead of in the courts. Whatever the results of the elections, this is what should be offered.

Advertisements

Please leave a comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s